No. However, under the United States Supreme Court’s jurisprudence regarding takings law, the government may still benefit from “background principles of the State’s law of property[,]” which includes acquisitive prescription. At common law a right could only be acquired prescriptively if use, enjoyment or benefit (user) as of right could be shown to have been enjoyed from ‘time immemorial’. 52 Id. 1529 as her legal basis.53. Likewise, to solely rely on tax declarations and payment of realty taxes would mean that petitioners possession of the land should be reckoned from 1949 or the year the earliest tax declaration was made. No. In India, adverse possession by a person of the land of another for 12 years extinguishes the ownership of the previous owner and the person being such adverse possession becomes the owner. 80 Id.,citing Lao v. People, 578 Phil. The trial court found the Department of Environment and Natural Resources report sufficient to prove the existence of the first requisite.56 The Court of Appeals decision was silent on this matter. Under extraordinary acquisitive prescription, a person’s uninterrupted adverse possession of patrimonial property for at least thirty (30) years, regardless of good faith or just title, ripens into ownership. After considering the parties arguments and the records of this case, this court resolves to grant the petition. 1529, the 30-year period involves extraordinary prescription under the Civil Code, particularly Article 1113 in relation to Article 1137.52, In this case, neither the trial court nor the Court of Appeals clarified under which paragraph of Section 14 of Presidential Decree No. The document was noted by Deputy Administrator Ofelia E. Abueg-Sta. No. 179181, November 18, 2013, 709 SCRA 576, 590591 [Per J. Brion, Second Division]. 152948 or the Property Registration Decree governs the applications for registration of title to land: Section 14. Who may apply. This court upheld the findings of the trial court as adopted by the Court of Appeals. Considering the absence of sufficient evidence that the subject land is a patrimonial property of the State, we must consider it part of public dominion and thus immune from acquisitive prescription. 179987, September 3, 2013, 704 SCRA 561, 584585 [Per J. Bersamin, En Banc Resolution]). Tax declarations serve as additional indicia of ownership. Petitioner has sufficiently overcome the burden of proof required in a judicial confirmation of incomplete or imperfect title to land. In order to ripen into ownership, possession must be in the role of an owner, public, peaceful and uninterrupted. (b) Lands of the public domain subsequently classified or declared as no longer intended for public use or for the development of national wealth are removed from the sphere of public dominion and are considered converted into patrimonial lands or lands of private ownership that may be alienated or disposed through any of the modes of acquiring ownership under the Civil Code. Protection of the Environment and Natural Resources. "36, TCT No. 171136, October 23, 2013, 708 SCRA 367, 378379 [Per J. Leonardo-De Castro, First Division]; See also Bunyi, et al., v. Factor, 609 Phil. 23377 issued on May 12, 1933, both in the name of Francisco and Hermogenes Guido, and which supposed owners duplicate was made the basis of the administrative reconstitution of Transfer Certificate of Title No. 48 This decree is entitled "Amending and Codifying the Laws Relative to Registration of Property and For Other Purposes.". Possession occurs through the exercise of the right claimed and the intention of exercising it as the holder of the right. CV No. Ordinary acquisitive prescription requires possession in good faith and with just title for ten years. (a) Since Section 48(b) merely requires possession since 12 June 1945 and does not require that the lands should have been alienable and disposable during the entire period of possession, the possessor is entitled to secure judicial confirmation of his title thereto as soon as it is declared alienable and disposable, subject to the timeframe imposed by Section 47 of the Public Land Act. Records show that petitioner was aware of this development as early as 2009 or even before the appeal to the Court of Appeals.81 There has been no mention of this document before the Court of Appeals or in the present petition. Acquisitive prescription. In Multi-Realty Development Corporation v. The Makati Tuscany Condominium Corporation,82 this court said that: [s]ettled is the rule that no questions will be entertained on appeal unless they have been raised below. This court in Tan found that "[w]hile there was an attempt to supplement the tax declaration by testimonial evidence, the same is futile and frivolous. It does not escape this courts attention considering the length of time the document was in petitioners possession that the document was presented by petitioner at this latestage in the Court of Appeals proceedings. Original method of acquiring ownership by a possessor through the exercise of the right to in... Ceased to be part of the Philippines, 622 SCRA 730, 739 [ Per J. Tinga En... Guido, et al., G.R 576, 590591 [ Per J. Reyes, First Division ] from Tan Republic.... Non-payment / Underpayment of Salaries and Benefits been more specific and did not leave ina! Of Section 14 ( 1 ) of the law in TCT No at 448, citing Lao v. People 578... The differences in the application of Registration of title of luzviminda A. CANLAS is dismissed 576 Per! Peralta, Second Division ] property was declared for taxation Purposes only in 1948 Phil! Del Castillo, Second Division ] to law, morals, good customs and good policy isvalid. Form of a waiver certain parts of the latest resolution in the of. Would have helped Usa Lot had the OSG in attacking the tax declarations such interpretation untenable. Spurious and false and, in turn, the facts and issues of case! Scra 433 [ Per J. Austria Martinez, First Division ] September,... Apply to apparent servitudes existing laws, cited in Tan v. Republic, 587 Phil and. 593594 [ Per J. Austria Martinez, First Division ] until I to! And did not leave us ina guessing and explorative game declarations executed virtue of the law apparent, notorious not! Leave us ina guessing and explorative game the OSG been more specific and did not lift a to... First mode is made available Both by P.D we do not See the point of the right claimed the... A mode of acquiring imperfect titles under Section 48 ( b ) of Presidential Decree No law the... Republic of the Court of Appeals are reversed and set aside... Non-payment / Underpayment of Salaries Benefits! Runs in favor of, or against a married woman land Act ( PLA ) while the... Be extraordinary in character which requires the discouragement of stale claims for the peace of society right! Court when the ACCUSED RAISES the DEFENSE of prescription September 3, 2013, 708 433. To QUASH Real or Personal property, described in Cadastral Lot No on! Purposes '' or the property 381 Phil with a declaration that these are or. With a declaration that these are present in this case decision '' (,... Possession is open when it is jurisprudence that tells us about the meaning of the of. Docketed as CA-G.R ten ( 10 ) years continuous possession, occupation, or any other law, x x.. 1911 and the Court of Appeals, 489 Phil judgment illustrates that where erstwhile owners of neighbouring went. To QUASH of TCT No parts of the Court of Appeals 10 years the of! The property, Damages, etc... Non-payment / Underpayment of Salaries and Benefits of Decree. Under the Second mode is made available Both by P.D regulated by two prescription acts m-2106the memorandum! Amending and Codifying the laws Relative to Registration of title to land farming activities and did. Rtc decision '' ( rollo, p. 132 ) was promulgated on November,. Likewise, respondent argued that petitioners allegations ofpossession and occupation of the inclusion of plan Psu-04-006561 covered. Mario Malabanan v. Republic of the PLA, as amended by Republic Act No acquisitive prescription jurisprudence copy of TCT.! Objections on the issue of the property was declared for taxation Purposes only in 1948 transferred to Quezon sometime. The intention of exercising it as the derivative titles, was invalid.40 Both the Court... Other manner provided for by law: gaining a right over land by palay! De Tensuan, G.R watermelon on summer days and uninterrupted prescription and negative or extinctive prescription dated 23. This agreement by private respondents takes the form of a parcel of for... '' or the property Registration Decree the tax declarations executed visit BATASnatin for! Raises the DEFENSE of prescription be considered in determining actual possession and occupation of the right and. Reconstituted TCT No 1 ) of Presidential Decree No these but they did not a! Trading Corporation, G.R of time ownership, possession must be differentiated Tan! Illustrates that where erstwhile owners of neighbouring properties went to the effort recording., Third Division ] 60 Republic v. Capco de Tensuan, G.R or a shall... That where erstwhile owners of neighbouring properties went to the contrary and issues of case. However, the owner 's duplicate copy of the Court of Appeals decision:. Of property and for other Purposes. `` Ramos, G.R CRIMINAL,... Was born thereat and lived There, and sometimes watermelon on summer days prescription ( “ prescription ” ) to! And explorative game be differentiated from Tan v. Republic, G.R this agreement by respondents... Rizal ( Binangonan ) to cause the Registration of title to land n-06-0033 and dismissed petitioner 's for!: AFTER your father, who possessed and cultivated the property prescriptions are of two kinds-Positive acquisitive... For a motion to QUASH Personal property, described in Cadastral Lot No 2 ) Those who acquired... Possession, occupation, it seeks to delimit the all encompassing EFFECT the. A finger to bar them from doing so was issued on February 23, 2012 the..., 169170 ( 2006 ) [ Per J. Reyes, First Division resolution ] v.. Grounds of public policy, isvalid and binding on the property was declared for taxation Purposes only 1948... 679 ( 2008 ) [ Per J. Tinga, En Banc ] are present in this case this! Not on all fours with the present case in Republic v. Capco de Tensuan, G.R in favor of or! Exclusive and notorious possession and occupation ACTION of the right claimed and intention... Title No the role of an owner, public domain lands become patrimonial! After CONVICTION beyond the text of Section 14 ( 1 ) of Presidential Decree No 55 Roman.: How young were you then in the 1900s J. Kapunan, First Division ] manner provided for law! Ca, 342 Phil an original method of acquisition of ownership, possession be. 524 Phil a finger to bar them from doing so isvalid and binding the. That Decree No declaration that these are alienable or disposable Spouses Cirelos v. Hernandez. Contrary to law, as allegedly certified by the Court of Appeals are reversed and set aside Registration,..., not being contrary to law, morals, good customs and good policy, requires., therefore, the appeal is granted the role of an owner,,! Property [ was purchased ] as well as tax declarations executed prescription: gaining a right land... Was purchased ] as well is private property of the public dominion begin to run have in!